- Finance by Tejas
- Posts
- Harsh Truth: Government's 50% tax on real estate
Harsh Truth: Government's 50% tax on real estate
A True Story of Indian Property Markets — Told Through Numbers, Not Opinions
Who Really Earns in Real Estate?
Is it the builder?
The broker?
The proud buyer?
Or the government?
If you quietly guessed “government,” you’re already ahead of the class.
Because real estate in India has one silent, permanent beneficiary — the State.
Not because the State is wrong… but because the system is structured that way.
Let’s decode it step by step.
The Stamp Duty Loop: A Never-Ending Cycle
Picture a single flat in Pune, Bangalore or Mumbai.
It changes hands 5 times over 20 years.
Does the government:
rebuild the road 5 times?
provide electricity 5 times?
redo drainage 5 times?
No.
But stamp duty gets charged 5 times.
Full. Fresh. Every single time.
Stamp duty and registration fees make the government the largest recurring beneficiary of real estate activity — without recurring expenditure.
Where Does Half the Money Go?
Take Mumbai as a textbook example.

For every new flat sold in redevelopment projects, nearly 50% of the sale value goes to the government through:
Component | Government’s Take |
|---|---|
Stamp Duty + Registration | 5–6% |
GST (under-construction) | 5% |
FSI Premiums, Staircase/Passage Charges | 30–35% |
Scrutiny Fees, Labour Cess, Land Tax | 5–7% |
Total | ~50% |
So, for a ₹2 crore apartment, roughly ₹1 crore is government revenue.
Builders absorb project risk, construction risk, financing risk, and regulatory delays.
Buyers take on loan risk, long-term liability, and maintenance.
But the government earns — every single time, with zero risk.
Again, these are not opinions.
These are documented financial flows.
The Cash Component: India’s Open Secret
No discussion about real estate is complete without acknowledging the cash component, which has historically existed across markets (though it is declining with digitization and RERA).
Here’s the simple factual reality:
Cash transactions inflate property prices.
They distort affordability.
They reduce transparency.
They create mismatch between “market value” and “circle rate.”
Due to this, sellers often price their property far above official valuation, making the formal economy look smaller and the actual cost for buyers significantly higher.
This is not a developer-bashing point.
Developers don’t control cash culture — the ecosystem does.
And the ecosystem is shaped by policy and tax structures.
Rental Yield: India’s Quiet Reality
One more fact about Indian real estate:
Rental yields are low — generally 2% to 3%.
Meaning, if a home worth ₹1 crore is rented out:
Annual rent ≈ ₹2 lakh to ₹3 lakh
Pre-tax
Before maintenance
Before society charges
Before property tax
Before occasional repair costs
After costs, the actual rental yield often dips below 2%.
This is simply how the Indian residential market behaves.
Not good, not bad — just factual.
It is one of the lowest rental yields among major global markets.
Unaffordability: The Big Elephant Nobody Talks About
The dream of buying a home is emotional, cultural, and aspirational — and yet the numbers reveal something stark:
In Mumbai, the price-to-income ratio is 50:1 (one of the highest in the world).
In Delhi NCR and Bangalore, it ranges from 12:1 to 20:1.
Salaries have grown at 6–8% annually, while property prices have grown much faster in key micro-markets.
Result?
Homes are becoming larger financially, not physically.
A ₹1 crore home requires:
₹20–30 lakh down payment
₹70–80 lakh loan
EMI of ₹65,000–75,000
Plus maintenance, taxes, and periodic repairs
This puts natural pressure on middle-class households, even before they begin thinking about education, retirement, or medical expenses.
These are not opinions.
They are the mathematical structure of Indian real estate today.
So… Who Really Earns?
Let’s list the beneficiaries in clean factual order:
Stakeholder | How They Earn |
|---|---|
Government | Stamp duty, GST, FSI premiums, land charges — repeated every sale |
Banks | Interest for 20–25 years on home loans |
Developers | Margin on construction + risk of delays and cost overrun |
Brokers | Commission per transaction |
Buyer | Long-term appreciation + emotional value |
Every stakeholder earns something.
But the government earns consistently, whether market is up or down, whether buyer profits or not.
Now the Final Question: What Should We Do?
Not attack developers.
Not argue with brokers.
Not blame buyers.
Developers deal with:
high land cost
expensive premiums
regulatory bottlenecks
GST
labour compliance
financing pressure
consumer expectations
And buyers deal with:
EMI burden
maintenance
rising costs
unaffordability
So where should the focus be?
If we want real estate to become transparent, affordable, and efficient…
our voice must be directed toward POLICY, not PROPERTY.
We need to question:
Why stamp duty applies repeatedly at full rate
Why premiums form 30–35% of project cost
Why circle rates and market rates differ wildly
Why rental yield is so low
Why affordability keeps slipping
Why cash culture still exists at the edges
Why government earns the most with zero risk
Real estate will become truly healthy only when:
transparency increases
taxation becomes rational
approvals become faster
policy becomes predictable
incentives reward compliance
cash component is eliminated systemically
The conversation must shift from “builder vs buyer” to
“citizen vs structural inefficiency.”
Because the real estate market is not broken —
but the operating system needs an upgrade.
How does Mutual Funds help in your property matters?
SIP in equity funds - helps you build corpus for downpayment, helps you channelise your low yield rentals into high growth wealth creation through mutual funds
Liquid Funds - help you store the money for short term while you are making payments/receiving payments
SWP from Hybrid Funds - helps you get regular cash flow at 6-7% if you happen to sell your property and want to preserve and grow the capital simultaneously receiving monthly income
Our role as a finance professional is not limited to your investments - it is also to give you peace of mind when you are in various phases of life. A good professional helping you is much better than a random Youtube/Podcast advice.
We have just started with our instagram page and would love your support: Finance with Fincare
Warm regards,
Tejas Lakhani